Why we all should be a little bit frightened right now, in a single short tweet: The company that is arguably best positioned to shape our AI future has (despite its BS name) been designed from the top—articles of incorporation—down to preclude people on the inside from sounding…

Even in the best case scenario where AI is super responsibly developed, deployed, and governed, it’s going to be pretty disruptive. Like, “slower Industrial Revolution with more redistribution” would have still changed social norms a ton + upset/hurt some people. But…(1/4)

Big tech has distracted world from #ExistentialRisk of #AI, says top scientist www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/may/25/big-tech-existential-risk-ai-scientist-max-tegmark-regulations #fintech #GenerativeAI @tegmark @alexhern @guardian

The regulator also verifies that the chatbot avoids answering queries on ‘politically sensitive’ topics. “These models need to implement core socialist values. There’s this challenge of ‘political alignment’ that AI developers need to come to terms with.” www.wsj.com/tech/ai/chat-xi-pt-chinas-chatbot-makes-sure-its-a-good-comrade-bdcf575c?st=0jdanbstfn2l0re&reflink=mobilewebshare_permalink